Working in perioperative care? Thinking about it? This site is for you!
June 26, 2010 – 7:57 am | No Comment

 
Come and join our  forums! Get up to date with the free online electrosurgery training from the MHRA. See the latest WHO Surgical Checklist adaptations for England and Wales from the National Patient Safety Agency.Whatever …

Read the full story »
Fitness to practise hearings

Health Professions Council (HPC) Nursing & Midwifery Council (NMC)

Alerts and Warnings

The latest alerts, warnings and rapid response reports. NCEPOD

Education

Preoperative, Perioperative and Postoperative Care Education

Operating Theatre Humour

and other amusing things from the world of surgery and anaesthesia

Videos

Everything from the WHO checklist to The Laryngospasms and Weird Al Yankovic

Home » Fitness to practise hearings

Whistleblowing nurse struck off

Submitted by on April 17, 2009 – 3:54 pm2 Comments

margarethaywood

A nurse who secretly filmed for the BBC to reveal the neglect of elderly patients at a hospital has been struck off for misconduct.

Margaret Haywood, 58, filmed at the Royal Sussex Hospital in Brighton for a BBC Panorama programme in July 2005.

She was struck off by the Nursing and Midwifery Council which said she failed to “follow her obligations as a nurse”.

Ms Haywood, a nurse for over 20 years, said she thought she had been treated harshly and had put patients first.

Ms Haywood, from Liverpool, said: “I am absolutely devastated and upset by it all. I think I have been treated very harshly”

“It is a serious issue and I knew it was a risk I was taking but I thought the filming was justified and it was in the public interest.

“I always made it clear to the BBC that patients would come first at all times.”

She said she had voiced her concerns through her immediate line manager “but nothing was really taken on board” and the whole process now needed to be reviewed.

‘Patients’ dignity compromised’

A Department of Health spokesperson said: “Whistle-blowers already have full protection under the Public Interest Disclosure Act passed by this Government.

“We expect that any member of staff who reports concerns about the safety or quality of care to be listened to by their managers and action taken to address their concerns.”

She was found guilty of misconduct on Wednesday following a fitness to practise hearing.

The panel said she “followed the behest of the filmmakers… rather than her obligations as a nurse”.

The chair of the panel, Linda Read, said Ms Haywood had prioritised the filming, which in the view of the panel “was a major breach of the code of conduct”.

She said: “A patient should be able to trust a nurse with his/her physical condition and psychological wellbeing without that confidential information being disclosed to others.

“Although the conditions on the ward were dreadful, it was not necessary to breach confidentiality to seek to improve them by the method chosen.

She said the misconduct was “fundamentally incompatible with being a nurse”.

“The registrant could have attempted to address shortcomings by other means. But this was never a course of action which she fully considered.”

Ms Haywood had admitted breaching patient confidentiality but denied her fitness to practise had been impaired.

This makes total nonsense of all the talk about openness and transparency in the NHS. Cover-up is the order of the game
Joyce Robins, Patient Concern

Elizabeth Bloor, the BBC programme’s producer, told the hearing there had been “an over-arching public interest” to produce the Undercover Nurse documentary because Panorama had received up to 5,000 complaints about conditions.

In November the panel found no evidence that Ms Haywood broke the NHS Trust’s policy on whistle-blowing by raising concerns about patient care in the documentary, or that she failed to assist colleagues when a patient was having a seizure.

A BBC spokesman said: “There was clearly a strong public interest in revealing that some elderly people were not receiving the level of care we expect from our national health service.

“Panorama believes that Margaret Haywood has done the elderly population of this country a great service.”

‘Right and proper’

The National Union of Journalists (NUJ) said its code of conduct stated that surreptitious means of gaining information were permissible in the public interest, and the same should apply to whistle-blowers.

Tim Gopsill, of the NUJ, said: “Sometimes the only way to get anything done is to go to the media. No-one could possibly argue that this story was not in the public interest.”

The panel’s ruling was also criticised by Joyce Robins, co-director of Patient Concern.

She said: “This just demonstrates the priorities of the regulators – rules come before patients every time. The message that goes out to nurses is: however badly you see patients treated, keep your face shut.

“This makes total nonsense of all the talk about openness and transparency in the NHS. Cover-up is the order of the game.”

Ms Haywood’s actions were also defended by Gary Fitzgerald, chief executive of Action on Elder Abuse.

He said: “We know that we’re seeing older people suffering the most appalling care and neglect too often in our care environments.

“In that context I believe what Margaret Haywood did and what Panorama did was right and proper.”

SOURCE: BBC News

Visit the theatreteam forum!

2 Comments »

  • The NMC did not take that decision. The Health Secretary made it at the DoH.

    If she wins her appeal, on the legal grounds of ”perversity” and so she bloody well should, then I doubt we will hear anything about the overturning of the striking off.
    (would send out the wrong message)

    Government wants to send out a message of course, we will come down on those who raise issues that place patients/public at risk.

    But knows full well that this BBC / Government backed panorama program will have sent out a national message to other hospital departments to get their act together.

    All in all it should be a win win situation in the end…..especially for the law firms and MDU MPS. regulators ie LAW FIRMS!! who do very nicely out of encouraging the NHS managers to report as many of its staff as possible, so THEY the regulators prosper nicely from dodgy referrals to fitness to practice councils ….Its a professional Gold mine.
    Some of the fitness to practice cases on the web sites that the regulators put up look very scary…..I.E did not draw up drugs…..What!? There are some hospital that have a custom and practice that you do not draw up drugs and the practice varies to whom you are working with.
    ODP profession is newly registered and still finding its feet, it is perverse that some managers (nursing) that harbour prejudice take advantage of this national confusion over drugs and make a case out of it especially if a member of staff has raised a public concern issue that affects the departments reputation.

    When reading some Regulator Case referrals be very very skeptical as to the motive of the original referral . The person may have raised Protective Disclosures at that establishment.

    Paul Marchant
    RSODP 18 years
    12 years Locum, 5 years NHS

  • Susan Greaves says:

    I complained about the misconduct of a colleague which resulted in a patient dying and my life was made absolute hell. I ended up off sick due to problems at work, nothing was ever done to support me. I had worked in the same department fot 20 years. Its a case of ‘put up and shut up, or else’.I no longer work for the NHS.

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.